2/4/04.
Letter #2
Toc's response to Dave's letter of 1/29/04 Dear
Dave
"Wow! Oh-my-god!" says Toc (the atheist [with the accent over reverence]).
Wow! I have no ideas how to thank you. I am so disarmed and opened-from-the-middle
by kindness. Thank you.
Really-truly
Thank you. It's
weird to always be outside where you can't get a reading of the world reading
you. You take your readings and offer your soundings, but you never can know if
anyone gets it ... accept... by such a kindness as your letter. I
believe that I'll always be outside (my niche, my habitual habitat), I didn't
imagine there was anything but an imaginary audience for the kind of psychological
landscaping I'm interested in (not yet at least). I am so THRILLED that you and
Gerhard liked it. It makes sense to me that you guys would like it based on
your own work. Again...Thank you again, and I promise not to thank you again.
My pal Tree says, "But what if he pulls you out of a river one day?"
I am very
much looking forward to what you guys do next. I have been looking forward
to number 300 since number 265. If I find I really like something I will wait
out the publication of its finish before reading it. I am very partial to feast
and famine style (everything) ... reading. My box-of-Cerebus goes back to
#5. And
funnily-enough, I lived in a tiny room-box for ten years two houses down from
Mr. BWS in the (tiny) town of Woodstock, but...1 never had a word with him and
I only saw him maybe twice in the ten years. (Though I loved Conan too when I
was a kid). I
sent the essence of your letter off to the hand-full of friends who like what
I do. I sent it as my proof of life on my dust-mote (of course none of them read
comics ... YET). I described you as the Robert Bly of comics. I chose Robert not
only because I love his images but because of how politically alert he is. (And
funnily enough he also got into a wrangle with feminists over his book "Iron
John" back in the early 90's. Check him out if he ever comes your way he
is so much more a visual experience than a read one). I
am sorry that you had to use up some of your luck on my account back at 9/11/01.
Luck is manna. Beside that city-sized weight of sadness that coated every salty
burnt smelling particle of ash still drifting down 2 days later, besides that
the city had become a militarized zone below Houston, besides that everyone on
the street spoke softly with larger eyes and a cringed listening, 3 people out
of the expected 300 showed up at my opening, and each with a strange hat on. We
peeked at them from the back room while getting pissed on Harps. Beside the reciprocating
shock waves of holy hatred and confused sadness and people beautiful reduced to
their un-constructed selves, there was for me in all of it a mythic scale... wink. Please
don't kick back for too long, the inertia of the world is a grating potato and
the revolution taking place in comics needs your blood to wet the wheel. Ho-ho!
("Surrealism is a world of carefully mix hot metaphors,
of visual poetry and it's condensation of words." -Comrade-X) Your
pal Toc
PS - Stuff
I've included: A
pile of give-away-comics of everything I've been able to print so far, if you
ever come upon anyone you think would like it ... please please pass the salt.
I didn't use your credit card. Your kindness was worth far more then money so
how could I be so mundane. Some
pages from my second big (27"x 42" .3mm pencil on, 33"x51",
200 pound cotton PH paper, Kids of Lower Utopia; Letters from the Front Lines
V6 N03) ongoing comic (a 46 page comic for my next show in the fall of 05 or spring
of '06). The
cover of my comic V2 No1 which is just waiting around for a donor. If I described
how poor I am, it would make you laugh out loud at least it has that effect on
me. (I've decided that self promotion is a not-so-subtle test to see if you can
be distracted from your work). I've
included a print-out copy of Kids of Lower Utopia V6 No.1 Chapter 1 (this first
book of 18 pages is done in ink). And I included the beginning of Chapter 2 which
will be a second comic done in pencil with a 30 page notebook of a hand written
dream in its middle, (all done at 6.125" x 9.625"). The following is
a note to a friend about this comic; and why the change in medium. "Volume
six of The Lost and Found Season of the Most Pope Joey, number one of Kids of
Lower Utopia, chapter one featuring, Daffodil Dash Eleven and Softdoor Scout Finnagain.
So this was the comic I was working on when Roger Ricco knocked on my door in
the spring 2000. I was working on page 18, and after his visit I immediately stopped
working V6.1 and began V6.2 which I had already mapped, though I hadn't mapped
that it would be done large in pencil, I hadn't thought I would ever be able to
afford to print a pencil addition which costs 16 times more then ink. But despite
the degutting-of-moneys, pencil returns me to the bright and shiny place of my
childhood, and I am convinced that the long machination of our individual subconscious'
set us up (and that's as close to "God" as I'll go) and sent Roger to
remind me of the very live and original voice of that most humble of creatures:
pencil. Now I just can't go back to ink, so the second book of this comic
is in pencil starting on page 20. When it is done then I will cry about money.
But for now I am thrilled to get back to the exhilarating speed of doing just
a comic, I had forgotten the reinforcing nature of a spiritual proletarian-ism
that fills me when I work comics. Art is so bogus, so embarrassingly feeble,
waiting for a kind word from such a dull gene-pool. Oh for the little rich, they
turn us into flimflams-gips and carneys for our crust, always juggling the money
away from their novo largesse. Oh blessed are the insecure marrow-suckers and
cake-eaters. (A bitterbit of HaHa!)" Finally
I must say that you of course don't have to write me back, I really appreciate
your recent letter and I am replete with it's encouragement so don't feel like
all this verbiage looks for a reply. I am just this way when I am shut away in
my rooom-box... my eagerness is allowed to run free. Yeeha. So
that being said; lastly (way beyond finally) I've included an essay on "why-a-comic"
which is a question that I've winged so many times that I thought it would be
useful to have it written. It includes a redefinition of Scott McCloud's; "juxtaposed
pictorial and other images in deliberate sequence." Why
did I include it? I wanted to create a definition that did not beg acceptance
but spoke it as granted by the potential inherent in Comics. And... if you see
anything, (other than everything), that erks you I would love to know. Feel free
to add and subtract, multiply and divide. Why-a-duck I
am asked often enough the question; "Why-a-comic," (since the by-product
of my comics is art), to warrant finally writing a useful answer. Other than comic's
emphasis on art as narrative, it is because the system works. The distributors
(Diamond in particular) are savvy enough to recognize the economic value of mutations
and thereby maintain an open system for the new and different. There are very
few limitations in self publishing (compared, of course, to being dead), Diamond
asks for a professional presentation; such that you make it easy for them to distribute
the work, and that is pretty much all they ask for. This seems reasonable since
they are in the business of business, and comics are just their lucky commodity. But
mostly why-a-comic is because to publish a personal comic is within the economic
grasp of the poorer class, where artists, for the most part, live. Why are artists
poor? Because the art is always smarter than the artist and thereby does the choosing,
(choosing its own expression). And if you make art and if it is your life, and
if your work does not fit the fashion of the time, than you will necessarily become
part of this poor class... or you will quit. In such a wealthy country as America
to be poor is to be invisible because most Americans' can not conceive of anyone
with an intelligent reason to be poor. Every
image has its story, its internal dialogue with time. Everything in form lives
and dies in time. So every young struggler I meet, I ask them what their work
is about - and when they tell me, I say; that is your story and these are its
images, publish a comic, see who responds. An essential part of the process of
art is that of putting the work out into the world to see if it is sentient enough
to live on its own, this understanding of objective distance can not be realized
in any other way. But... putting it out into the world has little to do with other
peoples opinions, it's really just a way to get that final juice of your own reading,
(the reading of what you did, and so ... will do next). The
audience of a comic is in a sense a single buyer of a piece of art -- that is
the comic. All those three-dollars come together to make a single amount that
pays for the life of the work. And over time more and more audience trickle in
increasing the recompense which supports the future work, the next comic -- the
next show. The
audience of comics are the ones who define the limits of what a comic is, they
are the actual critic. A small but consistent part of the entire comic audience
seems to willingly participate in an ongoing search for the new and subversively
interesting mutations in visual story telling, they encourage mutation with their
three dollar votes. It is a very direct response that includes question, letters,
and discussions in critique, it is very live. In
the gallery system the dealer stands between the audience and the artist, weeding,
choosing to show one over another as the representative (elected by the dollar-vote)
of a constituency (their clients). The gallery dealers know their clients' taste
and the limits of their attention. They attempt to educate and cajole their clients
into new realms of perception... slow work... for big money. The gallery takes
half and doesn't say to the artist; we like your work allow us to sell it for
you. What they say is; I like this, I like that, can you do more a-this to a-that.
They know their market -- you don't, and you had better be limber enough to participate
in this game of willingness or you will find out that there are thousands waiting
to take your place. The few changes asked of me were innate within my work and
excellent ideas. (Friends... you are not your ideas you are the way and the skill
with which you feel them). A gallery is a business and has a monster overhead
and must do what it takes to stay alive. That is the way
it works. In
comics the much more direct power of the audience to participate in the choosing
of their own culture is exhilarating. Eventually some part of that initial searching
audience, by virtue of their mutual dollar, becomes a single loyal patron of that
artist's work, and even the poor can afford a few votes each month. The live-ness
of this system is a direct check against the stagnation of the medium by the domination
of the addictive mundane consistency of corporation comics. (I have imagined that
the thinking for supporting this work is; better this than nothing). Another
answer to why-a-comic is that; the comic is an art form that travels. Instead
of gathering an audience in mass and traveling a distance to a gallery to see
the work, the art travels to the audience. It comes in a compact, replaceable,
disposable, recyclable, and all around hively humble form: a comic, whose intimacy
of voice does not fade or change by size of editions or time. The conservation
of useable time is a strong influence on everything in our culture including art;
we live for the higher protein of the Edit. When
my son is performing some questionable action I say to him, "Are ya helping
or hurtin?" There are feudal overtones to the ownership of original art,
in its small way comics are helping to move the world towards a more proletariat
percept of value where the value has moved from the physical thing (of the art)
to its expression as experiential-ideas. And once while traveling In Elysium I
met a kid who said to me (about art), "If you can't print it... you're on
the wrong side." "Helpin-or-hurtin," is a good question, it's the
kind of question you can't help but ask when you have a kid. Another
answer to why-a-comic (that is maybe too esoteric) is that because of the very
personal pacing of the medium -- the amount of silence inherent for each reader,
the potential for reading a kind of non-linear perceptual leaping by intuition
- is maximized. If a comic is a list of images in a formal proximity that initiates
a narrative experience -- a subconscious inductive/deductive narrative flowing,
then it strikes me how this definition applies to certain kinds of poetry as well.
I heard Robert Bly once say that some of his poems were "gathered" as
if he had readied the table for a feast just to see who would show up. This is
also is found in the Spanish and Persian poets, we call it surrealism or mysticism
but it's really just a form of surrendering to intuitive thinking (traveling inward
by means of the subconscious) these poets spoke a figurative poetry that read
the world as a conscious conversation, and maximized distance between metaphors.
Verbal images set in a formal proximity with other verbal images causing a narrative
flow ... is poetry. Comics
are a medium where the incantations of poetry can arc across in juxtaposition
with the direct-observations of visual-art, while both are embedded in the silence
inherent in the personal pacing of the medium. In comics that movement between
images, verbal to verbal, visual to visual, visual to verbal and back, within
that agreeable and formal proximity, has such potential of tension (measured in
absorption) that the compelling could equal the Heart's own velocity, allowing
you to feel that little amber juice in your chest that makes beauty so addictive.
Of course... that could just be me.
|